One of the things interesting to me about my blog that no
one reads is what does on occasion draw traffic here.
Misogyny and
death metal
How to make
guitar harmonies like Death
Allan
Holdsworth Death Metal
Sean Reinert, Gay
Chuck Schuldiner
AIDS
What is more, just this morning (January 31, 2013) on
checking my traffic stats I noticed a large volume of traffic to my site
directed from Facebook. As readers will know, I retired from Facebook some time
ago. Even when I was using that site the traffic to this blog from my Facebook
page was negligible. So why the sudden increase? Who knows? However, the
particular entry that has been drawing increased numbers is my Death
Metal and Misogyny entry. I'm quite happy that people are viewing my
blog but if only they would leave comments as to why, I could be happier.
It is humbling to know that it is not my writing on
comics or just about anything else that brings people here. The constant draw
card aside from google image searches is obviously death metal. I need to start
thinking about what else I can create, can link to the genre. Perhaps this site
will become a repository, a Lovecraftian multidimensional shrine to mortis ferrum. Frankly if that is the
case, I have no qualms about moving in this direction. What is a writer with no
readers?
I have noticed throughout the time I have kept this blog
that my own voice is one of the few critical and reflexive voices within death
metal, a critic and a fan. I have strived for a serious analytical tone yet
tried to balance it with a fan’s perspective. I have employed theory to crystallize
certain conceptual relationships yet I am not interested in typical theoretical
analyses of the music that I love.
Academic encounters with death metal (and heavy metal
music) tend to occur from within a sociological or literary, cultural studies
analytical framework. The drawback of these methodologies is that they are
frequently interested. What I do here
is certainly not disinterested and I
have never attempted objectivity. The
interested-ness of academic approaches forces analysis into a paradigm of
peer-reviewed publishing, conference papers and book chapters designed to
demonstrate the usefulness of certain theoretical and analytical methodologies.
My aim has never been to legitimize death
metal in an academic sense. Rather, it has been to create a space where it can
be analysed, discussed and appreciated on a level beyond “like/dislike”, where its
conceptual nuances and history can be unpacked from the perspective of a
listener and fan without fear or favour.
So where to now?
After my recent declaration regarding moving towards
seeking permission to online use of copyright images from owners and creators I
have found myself in increasing contact with the individuals responsible for
creating these products. Even though they are all a world away this is a very
rewarding experience as an artist and a fan. Before this digital age and the
collapse of the creative arts market I would never have had such expectations.
But now, I am starting to see the importance of person-to-person online networking.
Building a web of connections has become transparent, with a little hard work
and genuine commitment it is possible to create an ecosystem of creativity that
exists parallel to and independent of mainstream, commercial practices. I can
create independent, new knowledge about others, in collaboration with them.
So here is another declaration: the overriding theme of
this blog will henceforth be death metal. I will still write about other topics
as they interest me but the overall tone will move to a fuller engagement with
the subject that brings people here. Stay tuned for big things ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment